|
#1
|
||
|
Starbucks being sued for removing an offer
Starbucks is being sued for £60million for withdrawing a free drinks offer.
Read http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5344884.stm I wonder if the plaintiff will get anywhere with this. If the same thing happened in the UK, would there be any legal ground for a case? |
|
|
#2
|
||
|
The UK justice system would laugh at the woman...
God knows why the US is in such a terrible state with litigation. The lawyers are really sharks over the pond. ![]() I doubt it will go anywhere tho... (I actually just posted this same news story on another business forum lol) |
|
|
#3
|
||
|
*shakes head in dismay*
some people will try anything for a free buck. I hope it gets slung out of court, or she gets awarded $2 to buy herself a cup of coffee. |
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
I like the quote from the article "one customer in New York city felt so betrayed she approached a lawyer."
Betrayed?!? Pehaps a bit harsh just cos she couldn't get a free coffee. Crazy US stuff as usual :P |
||
|
#6
|
||
|
It says in the BBC article that it was an offer for employees and their family and friends. The court might get her to prove how she is related to or friends with a Starbucks employee. Really though, I don't get this at all. To me it sounds as though it was an informal message sent to company employees in the south-east of the USA. Now, not only does this woman live in the NORTH-east of the country, but if it was just an informal message, how can she say that it is a legal contract saying that the company HAS to give anyone who asks for it a free coffee.
And if it was a formal message done by the book, terms and conditions will reveal whether Starbucks has made a little mistake, or some mad woman thinks she is going to be able to fairly share $60 between everyone who *claims* to have been ripped off (money grabbers will end up getting $1 each perhaps! ).Philosophy: common sense should prevail. |
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|||||